Jump to navigation
Food and Agriculture Organization

User menu

  • Contact us
  • Login

Search form

  • English
  • Français
Indian Ocean Tuna Commission
Indian Ocean Tuna Commission
  • Home
  • The Commission
    • Overview
    • Structure of the Commission
    • Scientific Committee
    • Compliance Committee
    • Standing Committee on Administration and Finance
    • Competence: Area & Species
    • History & Basic texts
    • Conservation and management measures
    • Cooperation with other organisations
    • Capacity building
    • Performance Review
    • The Secretariat
    • Secretariat Staff
    • Allocation Estimations
    • Observers to IOTC meetings
  • Science
    • Overview
    • Scientific Committee
    • Status of the stocks
    • Working Parties: Science
    • Regional Observer Scheme: Science
    • Science: Capacity Building
    • IOTC Science Glossary
    • Invited Experts and Consultants
  • Compliance
    • Overview
    • Capacity building: Compliance
    • Compliance Committee
    • Information for MCS purposes
    • Monitoring of compliance
    • Port State Measures
    • Regional Observer Programme on Transhipments
    • Reporting Templates
    • Statistical document programme
    • StatDoc Validation
    • Vessel records/ IUU Vessels List
  • Data
    • Overview
    • Reporting data to the IOTC
    • Available datasets
    • Reference data catalogue
    • Fisheries identification wizard
    • Interactive data browser
    • Status of reporting of fisheries statistics
    • Capacity building: Data
    • Tagging Data
  • Projects
  • Meetings
  • Documents
  • News
  • Educational Tools

Quick links

  • Home
  • Allocation estimations
  • Capacity building
  • Conservation and management measures
    • Search
  • E-PSM application
    • Request to enter port (AREP)
  • IOTC Circulars
  • IOTC Science Glossary
  • IUU Vessel list
  • Interactive data browser
  • Performance Review
  • Statdoc Validation
  • Stock Status Dashboard
  • Vessel records
  • e-MARIS
  • e-RAV

Issues related to adoption of subsurface gillnetting to reduce bycatch in Pakistan

Reference: 
IOTC-2019-WPEB15-48
File: 
PDF icon IOTC-2019-WPEB15-48.pdf
Type: 
Meeting documents
Year: 
2019
Meeting: 
Working Party on Ecosystems and Bycatch (WPEB)
Meeting session: 
15
Availability: 
23 August 2019
Authors: 
Moazzam M
Abstract: 

Gillnet is a popular fishing method used for catching tuna and tuna like fishes especially by small scale fisheries of coastal states of the Indian Ocean. However, gillnets are known for extremely high bycatch which includes not only commercially important fish species but also a large number of non-target endangered, threatened  and protected (ETP) species. Information about gillnet bycatch is not well known from major coastal states, however, studies initiated by WWF-Pakistan provide comprehensive information about bycatch of gillnet fisheries of Pakistan. It is estimated that more than 12,000 cetaceans and 29,000 sea turtles used to be annually entangled in the gillnet fisheries of Pakistan alone. Their numbers may be equally higher in other countries of the northern Arabian Sea where a large gillnet fleet is based.

 

Considering high bycatch of ETP species, WWF-Pakistan introduced subsurface gillnetting in Pakistan as a mean for reducing entanglement and mortality of at least  cetaceans and turtles. Placing gillnet below 2 m proved to a success, as catches of target species of gillnet fisheries including yellowfin, longtail and skipjack tunas increased substantially whereas catches of some important species such as billfish and dolphinfish substantially decreased. However, high catches of target species i.e. yellowfin, longtail and skipjack tunas compensates for the losses incurred due to decreased catches of these two species group.

 

There was a major reduction in entanglement and mortality of cetaceans and turtles in subsurface gillnet. Entanglement and resultant mortality of cetaceans was observed to decrease from 12,000 in 2013 to mere 186 in 2018 (reduction of 98.45 %). Increase in landings of commercially important species including yellowfin, longtail and skipjack tunas is the main incentives for the tuna fishermen to shift from surface gillnetting to subsurface operations; however, there are a number of other benefits which resulted in its immediate and large scale adoptability by the tuna fishermen. By 2017, the entire tuna fleet was converted from surface to sub-surface gillnetting in Pakistan.

 

The operation of subsurface gillnetting is comparatively hassle-free as compared to surface gillnetting because the chances of fouling during deployment and retrieval are reduced. The number of floats in subsurface gillnets is reduced and  these float are placed in pairs attached to 2 m rope which make their chances of entanglement to much less than surface gillnetting in which floats are placed every at 4.5 m on headline where chances  of getting snagged are much higher. Less entanglements of ETP species help in saving time which otherwise lost during disentanglement and process of discard. Considering these merits, the gillnet fishermen of Pakistan shifted from surface to subsurface gillnetting within a span of less than two years. This method of fishing is getting popularity in other regional countries.  Crew-based observers posted by WWF-Pakistan reports that the success of subsurface gillnetting in Pakistan has induced fishermen from regional countries with whom they have regular interaction to adopt this method.

Footer menu

  • Home
  • The Commission
  • Science
  • Compliance
  • Data
  • Projects
  • Meetings
  • Documents
  • News
  • Educational Tools