Jump to navigation
Food and Agriculture Organization

User menu

  • Contact us
  • Login

Search form

  • English
  • Français
Indian Ocean Tuna Commission
Indian Ocean Tuna Commission
  • Home
  • The Commission
    • Overview
    • Structure of the Commission
    • Scientific Committee
    • Compliance Committee
    • Standing Committee on Administration and Finance
    • Competence: Area & Species
    • History & Basic texts
    • Conservation and management measures
    • Cooperation with other organisations
    • Capacity building
    • Performance Review
    • The Secretariat
    • Secretariat Staff
    • Allocation Estimations
    • Observers to IOTC meetings
  • Science
    • Overview
    • Scientific Committee
    • Status of the stocks
    • Working Parties: Science
    • Regional Observer Scheme: Science
    • Science: Capacity Building
    • IOTC Science Glossary
    • Invited Experts and Consultants
  • Compliance
    • Overview
    • Capacity building: Compliance
    • Compliance Committee
    • Information for MCS purposes
    • Monitoring of compliance
    • Port State Measures
    • Regional Observer Programme on Transhipments
    • Reporting Templates
    • Statistical document programme
    • StatDoc Validation
    • Vessel records/ IUU Vessels List
  • Data
    • Overview
    • Reporting data to the IOTC
    • Available datasets
    • Reference data catalogue
    • Fisheries identification wizard
    • Interactive data browser
    • Status of reporting of fisheries statistics
    • Capacity building: Data
    • Tagging Data
  • Projects
  • Meetings
  • Documents
  • News
  • Educational Tools

Quick links

  • Home
  • Allocation estimations
  • Capacity building
  • Conservation and management measures
    • Search
  • E-PSM application
    • Request to enter port (AREP)
  • IOTC Circulars
  • IOTC Science Glossary
  • IUU Vessel list
  • Interactive data browser
  • Performance Review
  • Statdoc Validation
  • Stock Status Dashboard
  • Vessel records
  • e-MARIS
  • e-RAV

Feasibility Study on Applying Close-Kin Mark-Recapture Abundance Estimates to Indian Ocean Tuna Commission Shark Species

Reference: 
IOTC-2020-WPEB16-13
File: 
PDF icon IOTC-2020-WPEB16-13.pdf
Type: 
Meeting documents
Year: 
2020
Meeting: 
Working Party on Ecosystems and Bycatch (WPEB)
Meeting session: 
16
Availability: 
1 September 2020
Authors: 
Rodriguez-Ezpeleta N
Patterson TA
Pereda I
Grande M
Davies CR
Lezama-Ochoa N
Zudaire I
Abstract: 

The Close-Kin mark recapture (CKMR) method is an innovative approach that allows estimating abundance and other important parameters by finding pairs of related individuals in a population based on their genetic make-up. The method that has been demonstrated suitable for application to fish and elasmobranch species and has been applied or is under consideration for application to about a dozen species. A revision of the studies performed or ongoing has revealed that the CKMR method can be applied to species spanning a large variety of life-histories, for which diverse levels of background biological knowledge is available, or with limited or extensive sample accessibility, as long as the model is adapted for each particularity. The compilation of the technical considerations associated with a CKMR study design, the evaluation of alternatives to overcome potential complications, and the review of available biological knowledge, catch data and tissue sampling programs has allowed to perform a preliminary assessment of the potential feasibility of CKMR for IOTC sharks. We have identified the blue shark, the shortfin mako and the silky shark as the most suitable species for application of CKMR. The blue shark has the advantage of having a well-known biology and potential for appropriate sampling logistics, but its large abundance suggests that a potentially impracticable number of samples will be needed to obtain the required number of pairs of related individuals. The shortfin mako has sufficient biological knowledge, potential for appropriate sampling logistics and the advantage of having a previous evaluation done for the South Atlantic suggesting that about 5,000-10,000 samples would be sufficient for finding the required number of pairs of related individuals. The silky shark has sufficient biological background but has the disadvantage of having less catch at size data, which might result in a more uncertain estimation of the samples needed. The next steps for assessing if CKMR is considered feasible for these species is establishing more formal sampling designs which incorporate the relevant biology and available information on likely population size to estimate samples sizes required for varying levels of precision in the abundance estimates.

Footer menu

  • Home
  • The Commission
  • Science
  • Compliance
  • Data
  • Projects
  • Meetings
  • Documents
  • News
  • Educational Tools