Jump to navigation
Food and Agriculture Organization

User menu

  • Contact us
  • Login

Search form

  • English
  • Français
Indian Ocean Tuna Commission
Indian Ocean Tuna Commission
  • Home
  • The Commission
    • Overview
    • Structure of the Commission
    • Scientific Committee
    • Compliance Committee
    • Standing Committee on Administration and Finance
    • Competence: Area & Species
    • History & Basic texts
    • Conservation and management measures
    • Cooperation with other organisations
    • Capacity building
    • Performance Review
    • The Secretariat
    • Secretariat Staff
    • Allocation Estimations
    • Observers to IOTC meetings
  • Science
    • Overview
    • Scientific Committee
    • Status of the stocks
    • Working Parties: Science
    • Regional Observer Scheme: Science
    • Science: Capacity Building
    • IOTC Science Glossary
    • Invited Experts and Consultants
  • Compliance
    • Overview
    • Capacity building: Compliance
    • Compliance Committee
    • Information for MCS purposes
    • Monitoring of compliance
    • Port State Measures
    • Regional Observer Programme on Transhipments
    • Reporting Templates
    • Statistical document programme
    • StatDoc Validation
    • Vessel records/ IUU Vessels List
  • Data
    • Overview
    • Reporting data to the IOTC
    • Available datasets
    • Reference data catalogue
    • Fisheries identification wizard
    • Interactive data browser
    • Status of reporting of fisheries statistics
    • Capacity building: Data
    • Tagging Data
  • Projects
  • Meetings
  • Documents
  • News
  • Educational Tools

Quick links

  • Home
  • Allocation estimations
  • Capacity building
  • Conservation and management measures
    • Search
  • E-PSM application
    • Request to enter port (AREP)
  • IOTC Circulars
  • IOTC Science Glossary
  • IUU Vessel list
  • Interactive data browser
  • Performance Review
  • Statdoc Validation
  • Stock Status Dashboard
  • Vessel records
  • e-MARIS
  • e-RAV

Defining stock status against conservation and management reference points: a global review for informing the process of status determination for key IOTC stocks

Reference: 
IOTC-2021-TCMP04-12_Rev1
File: 
PDF icon IOTC-2021-TCMP04-12E_Rev1.pdf
Type: 
Meeting documents
Year: 
2021
Meeting: 
Technical Committee on Management Procedures (TCMP)
Meeting session: 
4
Availability: 
11 May 2021
Authors: 
Ad hoc Working Group on
Abstract: 

The Kobe Plot has been widely used as a practical, user-friendly method for presenting stock status information and to characterize the status of stocks as “overfished” (B < BMSY) and “subject to overfishing” (F > FMSY). When providing advice on stock status relative to MSY-based reference points, IOTC stocks are currently considered to be overfished and subject to overfishing when the target MSY-based reference points are breached (i.e., SSB < SSBMSY and F > FMSY). However, there is no further change to stock status when the limit reference points are breached; which may not consistent with the intended application of target and limit reference points. For example, when managing stocks to MSY-based target reference points (the agreed/desired state of the stock) it is expected that the stock will fluctuate around that target, sometimes above and sometimes below, due to natural fluctuation in recruitment, stock abundance or other sources of variability.
The adoption of new target and limit reference points (IOTC Res. 15/10), requires a review of the approach used to determine stock status relative to these new reference points. As suchm, the IOTC Scientific Committee recommended to consider alternative formulations of the Kobe plot to indicate an appropriate buffer zone below BMSY to account for natural variations in biomass. In 2019, the TCMP recommended that discussions on potential refinements to the Kobe plots and definitions of “overfished” and “overfishing” in relation to target and limit reference points to be conducted in collaboration with other t-RFMOs. This document discusses and provides possible alternative approaches for evaluating stock status (i.e. “overfished” and “overfishing”) and communicating scientific management advice considering limit and target reference points.

Footer menu

  • Home
  • The Commission
  • Science
  • Compliance
  • Data
  • Projects
  • Meetings
  • Documents
  • News
  • Educational Tools