Jump to navigation
Food and Agriculture Organization

User menu

  • Contact us
  • Login

Search form

  • English
  • Français
Indian Ocean Tuna Commission
Indian Ocean Tuna Commission
  • Home
  • The Commission
    • Overview
    • Structure of the Commission
    • Scientific Committee
    • Compliance Committee
    • Standing Committee on Administration and Finance
    • Competence: Area & Species
    • History & Basic texts
    • Conservation and management measures
    • Cooperation with other organisations
    • Capacity building
    • Performance Review
    • The Secretariat
    • Secretariat Staff
    • Allocation Estimations
    • Observers to IOTC meetings
  • Science
    • Overview
    • Scientific Committee
    • Status of the stocks
    • Working Parties: Science
    • Regional Observer Scheme: Science
    • Science: Capacity Building
    • IOTC Science Glossary
    • Invited Experts and Consultants
  • Compliance
    • Overview
    • Capacity building: Compliance
    • Compliance Committee
    • Information for MCS purposes
    • Monitoring of compliance
    • Port State Measures
    • Regional Observer Programme on Transhipments
    • Reporting Templates
    • Statistical document programme
    • StatDoc Validation
    • Vessel records/ IUU Vessels List
  • Data
    • Overview
    • Reporting data to the IOTC
    • Available datasets
    • Reference data catalogue
    • Fisheries identification wizard
    • Interactive data browser
    • Status of reporting of fisheries statistics
    • Capacity building: Data
    • Tagging Data
  • Projects
  • Meetings
  • Documents
  • News
  • Educational Tools

Quick links

  • Home
  • Allocation estimations
  • Capacity building
  • Conservation and management measures
    • Search
  • E-PSM application
    • Request to enter port (AREP)
  • IOTC Circulars
  • IOTC Science Glossary
  • IUU Vessel list
  • Interactive data browser
  • Performance Review
  • Statdoc Validation
  • Stock Status Dashboard
  • Vessel records
  • e-MARIS
  • e-RAV

An update on satellite tagging of billfish around the Indian Ocean via the FLOPPED project

Reference: 
IOTC-2021-WPB19-12
File: 
PDF icon IOTC-2021-WPB19-12.pdf
Type: 
Meeting documents
Year: 
2021
Meeting: 
Working Party on Billfish (WPB)
Meeting session: 
19
Availability: 
1 September 2021
Authors: 
Nieblas A-E
Bernard S
Big Game Fishing Réunion
Brisset B
Chanut J
Chevrier T
Coelho R
Colas Y
Jayanti A
Evano H
Faure C
Hervé G
Kerzerho V
Rouyer T
Tracey S
Widyatmoko M
Bonhommeau S
Abstract: 

The FLOPPED project aims to investigate the reproduction zones of five billfish species in the Indian Ocean through a comprehensive data collection initiative, including satellite tagging data and biological sampling. Within the framework of this project, 100 satellite tags are to be deployed around the Indian Ocean, on blue marlin (Makaira nigricans), black marlin (Makaira indica), striped marlin (Tetrapturus audax), swordfish (Xiphias gladius), and sailfish (Istiophorus platypterus). Tagging and biological sampling were originally focused on six study sites, including Reunion, Mayotte, Mauritius (Rodrigues), Seychelles, Sri Lanka and Indonesia. However, due to logistical complications resulting from the global COVID-19 pandemic, we search for participants from a broader range of sites among our WPDCS colleagues to maximise the coverage and representativeness of this dataset. Here, we present on the first results of the 48 tags that have been deployed since the start of the project. Of these, 34 tags were deployed via a network of sports fishers using pole and line that were trained to tag by IFREMER and COOOL personnel in Reunion Island, Rodrigues, Seychelles and Mayotte. These tags were deployed on 23 blue marlin, 5 black marlin, 12 sailfish, 1 shortbill spearfish (Tetrapturus angustirostris).  An additional 7 tags were deployed via an experiment whereby tags were deployed by a fisheries observer aboard a Portuguese longliner targeting swordfish and operating in the Indian Ocean south of Reunion Island. Swordfish were caught on the longline and tagged at haul-back if they were alive and considered to be in good condition. Tags were programmed to release from the fish (“pop”) after 3 or 6 months. One of the 48 tags that were deployed is still attached to the fish, 3 tags popped after < 1 week due to a problem with the anchoring system, 3 tags popped after < 1 day, likely due to mortality and did not have sufficient data to calculate trajectories, 8 tags never transmitted a signal, and trajectories were estimated from 26 tags. The average duration of tag deployment was about 55% of the programmed time. Position estimates indicate that fish tagged in the south-western Indian Ocean tend to swim to the north-west Indian Ocean off Somalia. Some marlin appeared to have a northeastern trajectory, and one swam directly from Reunion to the southern tip of Madagascar. Marlin and sailfish appear to inhabit the top 200 meters during the day and restrict their depth range to the upper 50-100 m at night. In contrast, swordfish in the southern Indian Ocean appear to inhabit the top 600 meters during the day, and restrict their depth range to the top 200 m at night. While we were able to obtain some data from the longline swordfish tagging experiment, the tagged fish experienced a high rate of mortality, likely due to extended time on the line. We note that our tagging protocol is a living document and is improved after evaluation of each event. We use our increasing experience to train a network of sports fishers, and we encourage any IOTC colleagues interested in participating to contact our team.

Footer menu

  • Home
  • The Commission
  • Science
  • Compliance
  • Data
  • Projects
  • Meetings
  • Documents
  • News
  • Educational Tools