Jump to navigation
Food and Agriculture Organization

User menu

  • Contact us
  • Login

Search form

  • English
  • Français
Indian Ocean Tuna Commission
Indian Ocean Tuna Commission
  • Home
  • The Commission
    • Overview
    • Structure of the Commission
    • Scientific Committee
    • Compliance Committee
    • Standing Committee on Administration and Finance
    • Competence: Area & Species
    • History & Basic texts
    • Conservation and management measures
    • Cooperation with other organisations
    • Capacity building
    • Performance Review
    • The Secretariat
    • Secretariat Staff
    • Allocation Estimations
    • Observers to IOTC meetings
  • Science
    • Overview
    • Scientific Committee
    • Status of the stocks
    • Working Parties: Science
    • Regional Observer Scheme: Science
    • Science: Capacity Building
    • IOTC Science Glossary
    • Invited Experts and Consultants
  • Compliance
    • Overview
    • Capacity building: Compliance
    • Compliance Committee
    • Information for MCS purposes
    • Monitoring of compliance
    • Port State Measures
    • Regional Observer Programme on Transhipments
    • Reporting Templates
    • Statistical document programme
    • StatDoc Validation
    • Vessel records/ IUU Vessels List
  • Data
    • Overview
    • Reporting data to the IOTC
    • Available datasets
    • Reference data catalogue
    • Fisheries identification wizard
    • Interactive data browser
    • Status of reporting of fisheries statistics
    • Capacity building: Data
    • Tagging Data
  • Projects
  • Meetings
  • Documents
  • News
  • Educational Tools

Quick links

  • Home
  • Allocation estimations
  • Capacity building
  • Conservation and management measures
    • Search
  • E-PSM application
    • Request to enter port (AREP)
  • IOTC Circulars
  • IOTC Science Glossary
  • IUU Vessel list
  • Interactive data browser
  • Performance Review
  • Statdoc Validation
  • Stock Status Dashboard
  • Vessel records
  • e-MARIS
  • e-RAV

Cetacean bycatch in tuna drift gillnet fisheries off Pakistan (Arabian Sea)

Reference: 
IOTC-2018-WPEB14-41_WITHDRAWN
Type: 
Meeting documents
Year: 
2018
Meeting: 
Working Party on Ecosystems and Bycatch (WPEB)
Meeting session: 
14
Availability: 
11 September 2018
Authors: 
J. Kizka
M. Moazzam
M. Niviere
U. Shahid
B. Khan
R. Nawaz
Abstract: 

DOCUMENT WITHDRAWN - FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CONTACT THE AUTHOR DIRECTLY

Bycatch is the most significant threat to cetacean populations at the global scale. Therefore, assessing
and identifying potential mitigation measures is critical for conservation and management. Here we
provide the first assessment of cetacean bycatch in tuna drift gillnet fisheries off Pakistan. Using a
network of trained captains (four 15-20m vessels), targeted captures (tunas) and bycatch data were
systematically collected from 2013 to 2017. Over the study period, a total of 3,874drift gillnet sets
was monitored. Two fishing methods using multifilament gillnets were used: surface and subsurface
gillnets. Surface gillnets were deployed at the surface, whereas “subsurface” gillnets were deployed at
2 meters below the surface (net height varied from 10 to 14m). A total of 203 cetacean captures were
recorded (0.04% of all captures, all taxa included). A total of seven species of cetaceans was recorded
as bycatch, including spinner dolphin (Stenella longirostris), common bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops
truncatus
), common dolphin (Delphinus delphis), striped dolphin (Stenella coeruleoalba), pantropical
spotted dolphin (Stenella attenuata), Risso’s dolphin (Grampus griseus), dwarf sperm whale (Kogia
sima
) and an unidentified baleen whale (Balaenoptera spp., probably Balaenoptera edeni). Captures
Per Unit of Effort (CPUEs) were calculated for both targeted species and cetaceans, and were also
compared between the two fishing methods used. Overall, tuna CPUEs in surface and subsurface
gillnets were not significantly different, whereas cetacean bycatch was significantly higher in surface
gillnets. Cetacean bycatch is potentially a major issue in the northern Indian Ocean since drift gillnet
fisheries are rising in the region. Our results most likely reflect minimal bycatch levels. However,
although this study should be expanded spatially and using other methods (electronic monitoring
systems), subsurface gillnet deployments could significantly reduce cetacean bycatch in Indian Ocean
tuna drift gillnet fisheries and should be recommended as a precautionary solution.

Footer menu

  • Home
  • The Commission
  • Science
  • Compliance
  • Data
  • Projects
  • Meetings
  • Documents
  • News
  • Educational Tools