Jump to navigation
Food and Agriculture Organization

User menu

  • Contact us
  • Login

Search form

  • English
  • Français
Indian Ocean Tuna Commission
Indian Ocean Tuna Commission
  • Home
  • The Commission
    • Overview
    • Structure of the Commission
    • Scientific Committee
    • Compliance Committee
    • Standing Committee on Administration and Finance
    • Competence: Area & Species
    • History & Basic texts
    • Conservation and management measures
    • Cooperation with other organisations
    • Capacity building
    • Performance Review
    • The Secretariat
    • Secretariat Staff
    • Allocation Estimations
    • Observers to IOTC meetings
  • Science
    • Overview
    • Scientific Committee
    • Status of the stocks
    • Working Parties: Science
    • Regional Observer Scheme: Science
    • Science: Capacity Building
    • IOTC Science Glossary
    • Invited Experts and Consultants
  • Compliance
    • Overview
    • Capacity building: Compliance
    • Compliance Committee
    • Information for MCS purposes
    • Monitoring of compliance
    • Port State Measures
    • Regional Observer Programme on Transhipments
    • Reporting Templates
    • Statistical document programme
    • StatDoc Validation
    • Vessel records/ IUU Vessels List
  • Data
    • Overview
    • Reporting data to the IOTC
    • Available datasets
    • Reference data catalogue
    • Fisheries identification wizard
    • Interactive data browser
    • Status of reporting of fisheries statistics
    • Capacity building: Data
    • Tagging Data
  • Projects
  • Meetings
  • Documents
  • News
  • Educational Tools

Quick links

  • Home
  • Allocation estimations
  • Capacity building
  • Conservation and management measures
    • Search
  • E-PSM application
    • Request to enter port (AREP)
  • IOTC Circulars
  • IOTC Science Glossary
  • IUU Vessel list
  • Interactive data browser
  • Performance Review
  • Statdoc Validation
  • Stock Status Dashboard
  • Vessel records
  • e-MARIS
  • e-RAV

Pelagic longline fishing operation parameters optimization - A case study on targeting yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) in the Indian Ocean

Reference: 
IOTC-2019-WPTT21-25
File: 
File IOTC-2019-WPTT21-25.docx
Type: 
Meeting documents
Year: 
2019
Meeting: 
Working Party on Tropical Tunas (WPTT)
Meeting session: 
21
Availability: 
10 October 2019
Authors: 
Song L
Qi Y
Abstract: 

In longline fishery, in order to improve fishing efficiency, it was necessary to accurately control the depth of hooks to set the hook as far as possible in the preferred water layer of target species. In this paper, the catenary hook depth formula was used to calculate the theoretical depth of the hook. The environmental data, e.g. wind speed (Vw), gear drift velocity (Vg), angle of attack (Qw) (the angle between the prevailing course in deploying the gear and direction that the fishing gear was drifting), the wind angle (γ) (the angle between the direction of the wind and the prevailing course in deploying the gear), and operation parameters, e.g. line shooting speed (V1), vessel speed (V2), the number of hooks between two floats (Nb), and time interval between two hooks (t), were collected and the actual hook depth (Df) were measured on board of the longliners. The multiple linear stepwise regression analysis was used to establish the hook depth prediction model with the theoretical depth , the environmental data and operation parameters as the independent variables and the measured hook depth (Df) as the dependent variable to predict hook depth (Df'). This paper used Matlab software to code the operation parameter calculation, calculate the predicted hook depth (Df) within the preset range of each parameter, respectively and select the range of operation parameters when the hook numbers distributed in the preferred water layer (100m-160m) of yellowfin tuna was maximum. The results show that: 1) the prediction model of hook depth was , where,  was the ordinal number of hook counted from one float side and other parameters as above; 2) the number of hooks distributed in the water layer of 100m-160m increased with the increase of Nb. When Nb =17, the percentage was the smallest (76.5%), and when Nb =27, the percentage was the largest (85.2%); 3) when the number of hooks between the two floats was 17-27, the hook depth mostly concentrated in the depth range of 140-160m; 4) when the number of hooks was the highest in the water layer of 100-160m, the operating parameters, e.g shortening rate (k), line shooting speed (V1), the vessel speed (V2) and the wind speed (Vw) decrease with the increase of the number of hooks between the two floats (Nb). This paper suggested that: 1) the multiple linear stepwise regression analysis can be used to accurately predict the hook depth; 2) results suggested that the Nb should be 20-23, k should be 0.77-0.9, V1 should be 5-7m/s, V2 should be 3.8-5 m/s, t should be 6-8s, Vw should be 0-6.5m/s, to ensure the percentage of hooks distributed in the range of 100-160m higher than 80%; 3) optimizing the depth of hooks according to this study would help to reduce bycatch of some sharks and turtles, etc.

Footer menu

  • Home
  • The Commission
  • Science
  • Compliance
  • Data
  • Projects
  • Meetings
  • Documents
  • News
  • Educational Tools