Jump to navigation
Food and Agriculture Organization

User menu

  • Contact us
  • Login

Search form

  • English
  • Français
Indian Ocean Tuna Commission
Indian Ocean Tuna Commission
  • Home
  • The Commission
    • Overview
    • Structure of the Commission
    • Scientific Committee
    • Compliance Committee
    • Standing Committee on Administration and Finance
    • Competence: Area & Species
    • History & Basic texts
    • Conservation and management measures
    • Cooperation with other organisations
    • Capacity building
    • Performance Review
    • The Secretariat
    • Secretariat Staff
    • Allocation Estimations
    • Observers to IOTC meetings
  • Science
    • Overview
    • Scientific Committee
    • Status of the stocks
    • Working Parties: Science
    • Regional Observer Scheme: Science
    • Science: Capacity Building
    • IOTC Science Glossary
    • Invited Experts and Consultants
  • Compliance
    • Overview
    • Capacity building: Compliance
    • Compliance Committee
    • Information for MCS purposes
    • Monitoring of compliance
    • Port State Measures
    • Regional Observer Programme on Transhipments
    • Reporting Templates
    • Statistical document programme
    • StatDoc Validation
    • Vessel records/ IUU Vessels List
  • Data
    • Overview
    • Reporting data to the IOTC
    • Available datasets
    • Reference data catalogue
    • Fisheries identification wizard
    • Interactive data browser
    • Status of reporting of fisheries statistics
    • Capacity building: Data
    • Tagging Data
  • Projects
  • Meetings
  • Documents
  • News
  • Educational Tools

Quick links

  • Home
  • Allocation estimations
  • Capacity building
  • Conservation and management measures
    • Search
  • E-PSM application
    • Request to enter port (AREP)
  • IOTC Circulars
  • IOTC Science Glossary
  • IUU Vessel list
  • Interactive data browser
  • Performance Review
  • Statdoc Validation
  • Stock Status Dashboard
  • Vessel records
  • e-MARIS
  • e-RAV

Investigating population structure of bigeye tuna in the Indian Ocean using otolith chemistry

Reference: 
IOTC-2020-WPTT22(AS)-11
File: 
PDF icon IOTC-2020-WPTT22AS-11.pdf
Type: 
Meeting documents
Year: 
2020
Meeting: 
Working Party on Tropical Tunas (WPTT)
Meeting session: 
2 202
Availability: 
8 October 2020
Authors: 
Clear N
Eveson P
Darnaude AM
Labonne M
Artetxe-Arrate I
Fraile I
Farley J
Grewe P
Lestari P
Taufik M
Zamroni A
Priatna A
Aulich J
Lansdell M
Lozano-Montes H
Danyushevsky L
Fahmi Z
Wudianto
Murua H
Marsac F
Davies C
Abstract: 

Natal origin and stock structure of bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus) in the Indian Ocean were investigated using trace elements in otoliths. Otoliths were collected from (i) young of the year (YOY) bigeye caught in the west central and north east regions of the Indian Ocean, which are known to be spawning areas, and (ii) older fish in the south west and south east regions of the Indian Ocean. Otoliths were analysed by LA-ICP-MS at two points: near the core and at the edge, providing an elemental signal from material deposited while the fish were close to their spawning grounds and from material deposited while they were in or close to their capture areas, respectively. Twelve elemental isotopes were measured: Li, Na, Mg, P, K, Mn, Fe, Cu, Zn, Rb, Sr, Ba. Core and edge signatures for the same otolith were significantly different for most elements. Core signatures did not differ significantly for YOY bigeye in the west and east northern locations; this suggests that the ocean chemistry did not differ significantly between these locations. The core signatures for older fish in the west and east southern locations did not differ significantly from each other, but they did differ significantly from the core signatures observed for fish from the northern spawning locations, indicating either: (i) the fish from the southern locations were not spawned in either of the northern locations; or (ii) they were spawned in one of the northern locations but the ocean chemistry was very different in the years they were spawned. Core and edge signatures for the same otolith were significantly different and edge signatures also did not differ between fish from the two northern locations. While temporal variability in otolith elemental chemistry may confound spatial structure information, these results show that otolith chemistry can differentiate separate groups of bigeye within the Indian Ocean. Analysing YOY from known spawning areas over several years would set up a baseline for matching otolith cores from older fish collected in other areas of the Indian Ocean that may then provide evidence of population structuring.

Footer menu

  • Home
  • The Commission
  • Science
  • Compliance
  • Data
  • Projects
  • Meetings
  • Documents
  • News
  • Educational Tools