Jump to navigation
Food and Agriculture Organization

User menu

  • Contact us
  • Login

Search form

  • English
  • Français
Indian Ocean Tuna Commission
Indian Ocean Tuna Commission
  • Home
  • The Commission
    • Overview
    • Structure of the Commission
    • Scientific Committee
    • Compliance Committee
    • Standing Committee on Administration and Finance
    • Competence: Area & Species
    • History & Basic texts
    • Conservation and management measures
    • Cooperation with other organisations
    • Capacity building
    • Performance Review
    • The Secretariat
    • Secretariat Staff
    • Allocation Estimations
    • Observers to IOTC meetings
  • Science
    • Overview
    • Scientific Committee
    • Status of the stocks
    • Working Parties: Science
    • Regional Observer Scheme: Science
    • Science: Capacity Building
    • IOTC Science Glossary
    • Invited Experts and Consultants
  • Compliance
    • Overview
    • Capacity building: Compliance
    • Compliance Committee
    • Information for MCS purposes
    • Monitoring of compliance
    • Port State Measures
    • Regional Observer Programme on Transhipments
    • Reporting Templates
    • Statistical document programme
    • StatDoc Validation
    • Vessel records/ IUU Vessels List
  • Data
    • Overview
    • Reporting data to the IOTC
    • Available datasets
    • Reference data catalogue
    • Fisheries identification wizard
    • Interactive data browser
    • Status of reporting of fisheries statistics
    • Capacity building: Data
    • Tagging Data
  • Projects
  • Meetings
  • Documents
  • News
  • Educational Tools

Quick links

  • Home
  • Allocation estimations
  • Capacity building
  • Conservation and management measures
    • Search
  • E-PSM application
    • Request to enter port (AREP)
  • IOTC Circulars
  • IOTC Science Glossary
  • IUU Vessel list
  • Interactive data browser
  • Performance Review
  • Statdoc Validation
  • Stock Status Dashboard
  • Vessel records
  • e-MARIS
  • e-RAV

On the dangers of including demographic analysis in Bayesian surplus production models: A case study for Indian Ocean blue shark

Reference: 
IOTC-2021-WPEB17(DP)-INF02
File: 
PDF icon IOTC-2021-WPEB17DP-INF02.pdf
Type: 
Information papers
Year: 
2021
Meeting: 
Working Party on Ecosystems and Bycatch (WPEB)
Meeting session: 
1 701
Availability: 
31 March 2021
Authors: 
Geng Z
Punt A
Wang Y
Zhu J
Dai X
Abstract: 

The Schaefer and Pella-Tomlinson production models (LPM and PTPM) can be used to provide management
advice in data poor situations, as they require only a time-series of catches and an index of abundance. These
models are commonly fit using Bayesian methods, with the prior for the intrinsic rate of growth (r) set based on
the results of a demographic analysis. We used simulations based on blue shark Prionace glauca in the Indian
Ocean to evaluate the performances of estimation methods that reflect different assumptions regarding the form
of the production function and the basis for the prior for r. Nine age-structured operating models reflected
different levels of productivity (determined by the steepness of stock-recruitment relationship [h=0.4; h=0.6;
h=0.79] and the pattern of historical catches (increasing, stable and declining). As expected, estimation performance
was poorer for greater extents of observation error, and better when there was more ‘contrast’ in
biomass. However, the PTPM usually performed worse than the LPM, particularly for high levels of observation
error. Surprisingly, the prior for r with mean set to of the estimate of the r inferred from the demographic
analysis combined with the LPM performed best for an increasing catch series (a one-way trip in biomass) and
high uncertainty in the abundance index. Additional analyses revealed that the poor performance of the PTPM
was due to the additional estimation variance associated with the estimation of the shape parameter, while the
better performance for the ‘wrong prior’ occurred because the Schaefer model assumes a linear relationship
between growth rate and population depletion whereas an age-structured model implies a non-linear relationship.
Given poor data, r is not updated much, leading the LPM to overestimate productivity. This paper highlights
the dangers of naively integrating demographic analysis into Bayesian surplus production models, and the
value of including simulation analysis as a part of the standard set of diagnostics used when selecting an estimation
method on which to base stock assessments. We also recommend use of JABBA-Select or a prior for r from
a demographic analysis that accounts for the status of the population when the data on which the demographic
parameters are based as well as the form of the production function.

Footer menu

  • Home
  • The Commission
  • Science
  • Compliance
  • Data
  • Projects
  • Meetings
  • Documents
  • News
  • Educational Tools