Jump to navigation
Food and Agriculture Organization

User menu

  • Contact us
  • Login

Search form

  • English
  • Français
Indian Ocean Tuna Commission
Indian Ocean Tuna Commission
  • Home
  • The Commission
    • Overview
    • Structure of the Commission
    • Scientific Committee
    • Compliance Committee
    • Standing Committee on Administration and Finance
    • Competence: Area & Species
    • History & Basic texts
    • Conservation and management measures
    • Cooperation with other organisations
    • Capacity building
    • Performance Review
    • The Secretariat
    • Secretariat Staff
    • Allocation Estimations
    • Observers to IOTC meetings
  • Science
    • Overview
    • Scientific Committee
    • Status of the stocks
    • Working Parties: Science
    • Regional Observer Scheme: Science
    • Science: Capacity Building
    • IOTC Science Glossary
    • Invited Experts and Consultants
  • Compliance
    • Overview
    • Capacity building: Compliance
    • Compliance Committee
    • Information for MCS purposes
    • Monitoring of compliance
    • Port State Measures
    • Regional Observer Programme on Transhipments
    • Reporting Templates
    • Statistical document programme
    • StatDoc Validation
    • Vessel records/ IUU Vessels List
  • Data
    • Overview
    • Reporting data to the IOTC
    • Available datasets
    • Reference data catalogue
    • Fisheries identification wizard
    • Interactive data browser
    • Status of reporting of fisheries statistics
    • Capacity building: Data
    • Tagging Data
  • Projects
  • Meetings
  • Documents
  • News
  • Educational Tools

Quick links

  • Home
  • Allocation estimations
  • Capacity building
  • Conservation and management measures
    • Search
  • E-PSM application
    • Request to enter port (AREP)
  • IOTC Circulars
  • IOTC Science Glossary
  • IUU Vessel list
  • Interactive data browser
  • Performance Review
  • Statdoc Validation
  • Stock Status Dashboard
  • Vessel records
  • e-MARIS
  • e-RAV

Indian Ocean Yellowfin Tuna Management Procedure Evaluation Update April 2020

Reference: 
IOTC-2020-WPM11-12
File: 
PDF icon IOTC-2020-WPM11-12.pdf
Type: 
Meeting documents
Year: 
2020
Meeting: 
Working Party on Methods (WPM)
Meeting session: 
11
Availability: 
6 October 2020
Authors: 
Kolody D
Day J
Jumppanen P
Abstract: 

This working paper describes developments on the Indian Ocean Tuna Commission (IOTC) yellowfin (YFT) reference set and robustness test operating models (OMs), since the 2019 Working Party on Tropical Tunas (WPTT) and Working Party on Methods (WPM). In the following (for historical reasons), we mostly use the term MP and Management Strategy (MS) interchangeably, though we subscribe to the specific definition of MP as a subset of MS (as defined in the CCSBT and IWC, in which the MP aims for full specification and simulation testing of data collection and analytical methods). Management Strategy Evaluation (MSE) is the simulation testing process, using complex operating models, for evaluating performance of alternative MSs (or MPs). The intent was to obtain feedback on presentation requirements for the 2020 Technical Committee on Management Procedures (TCMP) meeting, and recommendations on further analyses and revisions for the OMs in preparation for the WPM and WPTT 2020 (but priorities changed due to the Covid-19 pandemic and remain uncertain).
There were requests for a number of YFT OM developments from the 2019 WPM and WPTT. These requests were made during a particularly busy WPTT meeting schedule, under the assumption that the OM changes would parallel the improvements realized through the YFT stock assessment update that was happening in parallel (at least that was our interpretation). However, the YFT assessment was aborted near the end of the formal WPTT meeting, and there was not time to discuss the implications of the various assessment innovations and their appropriateness for either future assessments or OM conditioning. The intent has always been that OM re-conditioning should not be required every year – only when there is evidence that the OM fails to adequately represent the plausible system uncertainty. In the absence of a revised stock assessment and a systematic discussion of proposed assessment/OM changes, we have interpreted the OM development requests as guidance for further investigation. However, it is not clear from the explorations undertaken to date that that we have improved the YFT OM relative to the previous iteration.

Footer menu

  • Home
  • The Commission
  • Science
  • Compliance
  • Data
  • Projects
  • Meetings
  • Documents
  • News
  • Educational Tools